U.S. President Brack Obama who has requested political party makers to offer $2.4 billion to Pakistan in form of financial help, has to face a big disappointment while Americna lawmakers of both Democratic and Republican parties rejected to do same.
According to source, they are calling it a “black hole” for American aid where the US has “sunk” $24 billion over the last decade.
In a statement, reportedly top Democrat on the house foreign affairs panel on the Middle East and South Asia, Gary Ackerman said, “Our tax dollars go in, our diplomats go in – sometimes, our aid professionals go in – sometimes, our hopes go in, and our prayers go in. Nothing good ever comes out.”
Pakistan that planned to open NATO’s border route for supply in wake of source of money from West has more need American’s money to run its govt and face crisis. It always pointed its target at America’s expense and that of its allies, for its national interest.
Image of Pakistan in front of globe is a head of terrorism against that U.S. strongly sanction to completely get rid out of world. Even for any small financial help, every one should think that Pakistan use it only for its evil purpose to destroyed other nations and being powerful itself.
“We should cut Pakistan off of every cent because it has been used for evil purposes, including killing American troops,” Republican Dana Rohrabacher said.
During hearing from all side, after examining it deputy special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Daniel Feldman concluded that cutting off aid would be short-sighted.
“Our current discussions with the Pakistanis on how best to pursue our common interests will take time to resolve, and it’s not easy right now to provide satisfying answers to some questions,” he said, as per source report.
Even Pakistan is continually trying to shelter, directly support from West for sponser terrorist, but without its cooperation Obama’s troops never can be able to kill more terrorists on Pakistani soil than just about any place else. And for that U.S. has to step forward indirectly with its strategy, no doubts it may be a fundamental foreign policy relationship.
